Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Intrusive vs. Non-Intrusive DPM




Using Direct Part Mark (DPM) technology to apply bar codes to a part is a small piece of the larger system that needs to be considered. Marking the part is less than half of the system – reading the part is a much bigger consideration and far more difficult.

Most of the DPM solutions create a bar code mark that provides only a low contrast differential from the surrounding material – a grey-on-grey situation – and for an optical technology like bar code this makes reading very difficult. A manufacturer who marks the part when it is brand new may have no understanding of what his Customer has to go through to read that same part when it is in-service and dirty.

The whole system of marking and reading in the real world has to be considered before making a final choice on which DPM technology to use on which part so that it will be usable for many years in actual service.

DPM technology solutions take two basic methods: Non-intrusive and Intrusive technologies, each with their strengths and weaknesses, to be considered below:

Intrusive vs. Non-Intrusive DPM




Using Direct Part Mark (DPM) technology to apply bar codes to a part is a small piece of the larger system that needs to be considered. Marking the part is less than half of the system – reading the part is a much bigger consideration and far more difficult.

Most of the DPM solutions create a bar code mark that provides only a low contrast differential from the surrounding material – a grey-on-grey situation – and for an optical technology like bar code this makes reading very difficult. A manufacturer who marks the part when it is brand new may have no understanding of what his Customer has to go through to read that same part when it is in-service and dirty.

The whole system of marking and reading in the real world has to be considered before making a final choice on which DPM technology to use on which part so that it will be usable for many years in actual service.

DPM technology solutions take two basic methods: Non-intrusive and Intrusive technologies, each with their strengths and weaknesses, to be considered below:

Non-intrusive Marking Methods

Marking methods that are non-intrusive to the material are produced as part of the manufacturing process or by adding a layer of material to the surface using methods that have no adverse effect on material properties. These methods include:


  • Ink jet
  • Laser bonding
  • Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS)

Less popular and/or successful methods:


  • Silk screen
  • Liquid metal jet
  • Stencil
  • Automated Adhesive dispensing
  • Cast, forge, and mold

Intrusive Marking Methods

Intrusive marking methods alter a parts surface (abrade, cut, burn, vaporize, etc.) and are considered to be controlled defects. If not done properly, they can degrade material properties beyond a point of acceptability. Consequently, some intrusive markings, especially laser, are generally not used in safety critical applications without appropriate metallurgical testing. Typical intrusive marking methods include:


  • Dot peen
  • Direct laser marking
  • Electro-chemical etching

Less popular and/or successful methods:


  • Engraving/milling
  • Fabric embroidery/weaving
  • Abrasive blast
Contact Us